期刊论文详细信息
Food Science and Technology (Campinas)
Quality of propolis commercialized in the informal market
Victor Alberto Tagliacollo1  Ricardo De Oliveira Orsi1 
[1] ,Universidade Estadual Paulista Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia Botucatu SP ,Brasil
关键词: bee glue;    physicochemical analyses;    inspection;    beekeepers;    própolis;    análises físico-químicas;    inspeção;    apicultores;   
DOI  :  10.1590/S0101-20612011000300031
来源: SciELO
PDF
【 摘 要 】

The purpose of this research was to evaluate the quality of propolis produced and commercialized informally in São Paulo State through physicochemical analyses of ethanolic extracts of propolis (EEP). Thus, 40 samples of in nature propolis, provided by beekeepers from 32 towns, were analyzed. The EEP were prepared in a proportion of 30% (w/v), and the physicochemical tests were performed according to the Technical Regulation of Propolis Identity and Quality. The pH of each EEP sample was also evaluated. Regarding the dry extract, it was observed that 80% of the samples meet the minimum requirements established by the Brazilian legislation. With regard to the oxidizing property, 67.5% of EEP were below the maximum time allowed for oxidation. With regard to the solubility in lead acetate, 97.5% of the samples showed positive results, whereas no sample produced a negative result in terms of solubility in sodium hydroxide. Regarding the concentration of flavonoids, 95% of the samples produced results consistent with the minimum value allowed, and regarding the phenolic compounds, all samples were in accordance with the legislation. The EEP pH was slightly acidic. Therefore, it can be concluded that most EEP is consistently in accordance with the Brazilian legislation, which suggests that good quality propolis is produced by those beekeepers.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
 All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202005130080941ZK.pdf 514KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:9次 浏览次数:11次