期刊论文详细信息
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Evaluation of MOPITT Version 7 joint TIR–NIR XCOretrievals with TCCON
Helen M. Worden1  Rebecca R. Buchholz1  Nicholas M. Deutscher2  David W. T. Griffith2  Voltaire A. Velazco3  Bianca C. Baier4  Colm Sweeney4  Sébastien Roche5  Kimberly Strong5  Tai-Long He5  Debra Wunch5  Dylan B. A. Jones5  Jacob K. Hedelius5  Coleen M. Roehl6  Paul O. Wennberg7  Matthäus Kiel8  Manvendra K. Dubey9  Rigel Kivi1,10  Justus Notholt1,11  Matthias Schneider1,12  Frank Hase1,12  Markus Rettinger1,13  Ralf Sussmann1,13  Kei Shiomi1,14  Wei Wang1,15  Pascal Jeseck1,16  Yao Té1,16  Dietrich G. Feist1,17  Laura T. Iraci1,18  Isamu Morino1,19  Hirofumi Ohyama1,19  Thorsten Warneke1,19  Young-Suk Oh2,20  David F. Pollard2,21  Martine De Mazière2,22  Osamu Uchino2,23  Cheng Liu2,23 
[1]Atmospheric Chemistry Observations & Modeling, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA
[2]Centre for Atmospheric Chemistry, School of Earth, Atmospheric and Life Sciences, University of Wollongong, Northfields Ave., Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
[3]Centre for Atmospheric Chemistry, School of Earth, Atmospheric and Life Sciences, University of Wollongong, Northfields Ave., Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
[4]Oscar M. Lopez Center for Climate Change Adaptation and Disaster Risk Management Foundation, Inc., Pasig City, Philippines
[5]Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA
[6]NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado, USA
[7]Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
[8]Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
[9]Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
[10]Division of Engineering and Applied Science, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
[11]Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
[12]Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
[13]Earth and Environmental Sciences, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA
[14]Finnish Meteorological Institute, Sodankylä, Finland
[15]Institute of Environmental Physics, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
[16]Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research (IMK-ASF), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany
[17]Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research (IMK-IFU), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany
[18]Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, 2-1-1 Sengen, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
[19]Key Laboratory of Environmental Optics and Technology, Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, 230031, China
[20]LERMA-IPSL, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, Observatoire de Paris, PSL Université, 75005, Paris, France
[21]Lehrstuhl für Physik der Atmosphäre, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
[22]Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre, Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany
[23]Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany
[24]NASA Ames Research Center, Mountain View, California, USA
[25]National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES), Tsukuba, Japan
[26]National Institute of Meteorological Sciences 33, Seohobuk-ro, Seogwipo-si, Jeju-do 63568, Republic of Korea
[27]National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Lauder, New Zealand
[28]Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy (BIRA-IASB), Brussels, 1180, Belgium
[29]School of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230026, China
DOI  :  10.5194/amt-12-5547-2019
来源: publisher
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Observations of carbon monoxide (CO) from the Measurements Of Pollution In The Troposphere (MOPITT) instrument aboard the Terra spacecraft were expected to have an accuracy of 10 % prior to the launch in 1999. Here we evaluate MOPITT Version 7 joint (V7J) thermal-infrared and near-infrared (TIR–NIR) retrieval accuracy and precision and suggest ways to further improve the accuracy of the observations. We take five steps involving filtering or bias corrections to reduce scatter and bias in the data relative to other MOPITT soundings and ground-based measurements. (1) We apply a preliminary filtering scheme in which measurements over snow and ice are removed. (2) We find a systematic pairwise bias among the four MOPITT along-track detectors (pixels) on the order of 3–4 ppb with a small temporal trend, which we remove on a global scale using a temporally trended bias correction. (3) Using a small-region approximation (SRA), a new filtering scheme is developed and applied based on additional quality indicators such as the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). After applying these new filters, the root-mean-squared error computed using the local median from the SRA over 16 years of global observations decreases from 3.84 to 2.55 ppb. (4) We also use the SRA to find variability in MOPITT retrieval anomalies that relates to retrieval parameters. We apply a bias correction to one parameter from this analysis. (5) After applying the previous bias corrections and filtering, we compare the MOPITT results with the GGG2014 ground-based Total Carbon Column Observing Network (TCCON) observations to obtain an overall global bias correction. These comparisons show that MOPITT V7J is biased high by about 6 %–8 %, which is similar to past studies using independent validation datasets on V6J. When using TCCON spectrometric column retrievals without the standard airmass correction or scaling to aircraft (WMO scale), the ground- and satellite-based observations overall agree to better than 0.5 %. GEOS-Chem data assimilations are used to estimate the influence of filtering and scaling to TCCON on global CO and tend to pull concentrations away from the prior fluxes and closer to the truth. We conclude with suggestions for further improving the MOPITT data products.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202004216559393ZK.pdf 7343KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:0次 浏览次数:1次