期刊论文详细信息
Sensors
Relative Radiometric Normalization and Atmospheric Correction of a SPOT 5 Time Series
Mahmoud El Hajj4  Agnès Bégué1  Bruno Lafrance2  Olivier Hagolle3  Gérard Dedieu3 
[1] Cirad, UMR TETIS, Remote Sensing Centre in Languedoc Roussillon, 500 rue JF Breton, 34093 Montpellier Cedex 5, France; E-mails:;Cesbio/CNES, 18 avenue E. Belin 31401 Toulouse Cedex 9, France; E-mails:;CS-SI, Parc de la Plaine, Rue de Brindejonc des Moulinais, BP 5872, 31506 Toulouse Cedex 5, France; E-mail:;Cemagref, UMR TETIS, Remote Sensing Centre in Languedoc Roussillon, 500 rue JF Breton, 34093 Montpellier Cedex 5, France; E-mail:
关键词: Radiometric normalization;    Atmospheric correction;    SPOT 5;    Time series;    Sugarcane;   
DOI  :  10.3390/s8042774
来源: mdpi
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Multi-temporal images acquired at high spatial and temporal resolution are an important tool for detecting change and analyzing trends, especially in agricultural applications. However, to insure a reliable use of this kind of data, a rigorous radiometric normalization step is required. Normalization can be addressed by performing an atmospheric correction of each image in the time series. The main problem is the difficulty of obtaining an atmospheric characterization at a given acquisition date. In this paper, we investigate whether relative radiometric normalization can substitute for atmospheric correction. We develop an automatic method for relative radiometric normalization based on calculating linear regressions between unnormalized and reference images. Regressions are obtained using the reflectances of automatically selected invariant targets. We compare this method with an atmospheric correction method that uses the 6S model. The performances of both methods are compared using 18 images from of a SPOT 5 time series acquired over Reunion Island. Results obtained for a set of manually selected invariant targets show excellent agreement between the two methods in all spectral bands: values of the coefficient of determination (r2 exceed 0.960, and bias magnitude values are less than 2.65. There is also a strong correlation between normalized NDVI values of sugarcane fields (r2 = 0.959). Despite a relative error of 12.66% between values, very comparable NDVI patterns are observed.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   
© 2008 by MDPI (http://www.mdpi.org).

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202003190058315ZK.pdf 553KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:1次 浏览次数:1次