期刊论文详细信息
Water
Physical Vulnerability Assessment Based on Fluid and Classical Mechanics to Support Cost-Benefit Analysis of Flood Risk Mitigation Strategies
Bruno Mazzorana1  Laura Levaggi2  Omar Formaggioni1 
[1] Department of Hydraulic Engineering—Abteilung Wasserschutzbauten, Autonomous Province of Bolzano, Italy, Cesare Battisti Street 23, Bolzano 39100, Italy;Faculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bolzano, Universitätsplatz 5, Bolzano 39100, Italy;
关键词: natural hazards;    vulnerability;    flood risk;    risk mitigation;    project evaluation;    European Alps;   
DOI  :  10.3390/w4010196
来源: mdpi
PDF
【 摘 要 】

The impacts of flood events that occurred in autumn 2011 in the Italian regions of Liguria and Tuscany revived the engagement of the public decision-maker to enhance the synergy of flood control and land use planning. In this context, the design of efficient flood risk mitigation strategies and their subsequent implementation critically relies on a careful vulnerability analysis of the fixed and mobile elements exposed to flood hazard. In this paper we develop computation schemes enabling dynamic vulnerability and risk analyses for a broad typological variety of elements at risk. To show their applicability, a series of prime examples are discussed in detail, e.g. a bridge deck impacted by the flood and a car, first displaced and subsequently exposed to collision with fixed objects. We hold the view that it is essential that the derivation of the computational schemes to assess the vulnerability of endangered objects should be based on classical and fluid mechanics. In such a way, we aim to complement from a methodological perspective the existing, mainly empirical, vulnerability and risk assessment approaches and to support the design of effective flood risk mitigation strategies by defusing the main criticalities within the systems prone to flood risk.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© 2012 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202003190045832ZK.pdf 318KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:12次 浏览次数:17次