期刊论文详细信息
Sports
A Comparison between Australian Football League (AFL) Injuries in Australian Indigenous versus Non-indigenous Players
Jessica Orchard1  John Orchard1 
[1] School of Public Health, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney NSW 2006, Australia; E-Mail:
关键词: sports injuries;    indigenous;    aboriginal;    Australian football;    AFL;   
DOI  :  10.3390/sports1030069
来源: mdpi
PDF
【 摘 要 】

It has previously been shown that being of aboriginal descent is a risk factor for hamstring injuries in Australian football. The aim of this study was to review the Australian Football League (AFL) injury database to determine whether there were any injuries where indigenous players had different relative risks to non-indigenous players. Analysis was conducted using data from the AFL injury database, which included data from 4,492 players over 21 years (1992–2012), covering 162,683 player-matches at AFL level, 91,098 matches at lower levels and 328,181 weeks (possible matches) of exposure. Compared to non-indigenous players, indigenous players had a significantly higher risk of hamstring injuries (RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.32–1.73) and calf strains (RR 1.30, 95% CI 1.00–1.69). Conversely, indigenous players had a significantly lower risk of lumbar/thoracic spine injuries (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.41–0.91), groin strains/osteitis pubis (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.58–0.96) and Achilles tendon injuries (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.12–0.86). The results for the above injuries were also significant in terms of games missed. There was no difference between overall risk of injury (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.96–1.10) or missed games (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.97–1.04). This suggests that indigenous AFL players have the same overall number of injuries and missed games, but a slightly different injury profile.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© 2013 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202003190033045ZK.pdf 318KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:10次 浏览次数:20次