期刊论文详细信息
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Noise Producing Toys and the Efficacy of Product Standard Criteria to Protect Health and Education Outcomes
Stuart J. McLaren2  Wyatt H. Page2  Lou Parker1 
[1] Measurement and Product Safety Service, Consumer Affairs, Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment, P.O. Box 1473, Wellington 6140, New Zealand; E-Mails:;College of Health, Massey University, P.O. Box 756, Wellington 6140, New Zealand; E-Mail:
关键词: noise;    toy safety;    autism;    ISO standards;    consumer products;   
DOI  :  10.3390/ijerph110100047
来源: mdpi
PDF
【 摘 要 】

An evaluation of 28 commercially available toys imported into New Zealand revealed that 21% of these toys do not meet the acoustic criteria in the ISO standard, ISO 8124-1:2009 Safety of Toys, adopted by Australia and New Zealand as AS/NZS ISO 8124.1:2010. While overall the 2010 standard provided a greater level of protection than the earlier 2002 standard, there was one high risk toy category where the 2002 standard provided greater protection. A secondary set of toys from the personal collections of children known to display atypical methods of play with toys, such as those with autism spectrum disorders (ASD), was part of the evaluation. Only one of these toys cleanly passed the 2010 standard, with the remainder failing or showing a marginal-pass. As there is no tolerance level stated in the standards to account for interpretation of data and experimental error, a value of +2 dB was used. The findings of the study indicate that the current standard is inadequate in providing protection against excessive noise exposure. Amendments to the criteria have been recommended that apply to the recently adopted 2013 standard. These include the integration of the new approaches published in the recently amended European standard (EN 71) on safety of toys.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© 2013 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202003190030549ZK.pdf 222KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:8次 浏览次数:10次