期刊论文详细信息
Remote Sensing
Comparison of Classification Algorithms and Training Sample Sizes in Urban Land Classification with Landsat Thematic Mapper Imagery
Congcong Li2  Jie Wang3  Lei Wang3  Luanyun Hu1 
[1] Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Earth System Modeling, Center for Earth System Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China; E-Mail:;State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, and College of Global Change and Earth System Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China; E-Mail:;State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; E-Mails:
关键词: machine learning;    maximum likelihood classification;    logistic regression;    support vector machine;    tree classifiers;    random forests;   
DOI  :  10.3390/rs6020964
来源: mdpi
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Although a large number of new image classification algorithms have been developed, they are rarely tested with the same classification task. In this research, with the same Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) data set and the same classification scheme over Guangzhou City, China, we tested two unsupervised and 13 supervised classification algorithms, including a number of machine learning algorithms that became popular in remote sensing during the past 20 years. Our analysis focused primarily on the spectral information provided by the TM data. We assessed all algorithms in a per-pixel classification decision experiment and all supervised algorithms in a segment-based experiment. We found that when sufficiently representative training samples were used, most algorithms performed reasonably well. Lack of training samples led to greater classification accuracy discrepancies than classification algorithms themselves. Some algorithms were more tolerable to insufficient (less representative) training samples than others. Many algorithms improved the overall accuracy marginally with per-segment decision making.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202003190029532ZK.pdf 1129KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:19次 浏览次数:26次