期刊论文详细信息
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Risk Factors Associated with the Choice to Drink Bottled Water and Tap Water in Rural Saskatchewan
Lianne McLeod2  Lalita Bharadwaj1 
[1] School of Public Health, University of Saskatchewan, 107 Wiggins Road, Saskatoon SK S7N 5E5, Canada; E-Mail:;Large Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, 52 Campus Dr., Saskatoon SK S7N 5B4, Canada; E-Mail:
关键词: drinking water;    bottled water;    tap water;    water treatment;    water quality;    risk perception;    aesthetic characteristics;   
DOI  :  10.3390/ijerph110201626
来源: mdpi
PDF
【 摘 要 】

A cross-sectional study investigated risk factors associated with choices to drink bottled water and tap water in rural Saskatchewan. Of 7,500 anonymous postal questionnaires mailed out, 2,065 responses were analyzed using generalized linear mixed models. Those who reported a water advisory (p < 0.001) or living in the area for ≤10 years (p = 0.01) were more likely to choose bottled water. Those who reported tap water was not safe to drink were more likely to choose bottled water, an effect greater for those who had no aesthetic complaints (p ≤ 0.001), while those with aesthetic complaints were more likely to choose bottled water if they believed the water was safe (p < 0.001). Respondents who treated their water and did not use a community supply were more likely to choose bottled water (p < 0.001), while those who did not treat their water were more likely to choose bottled water regardless of whether a community supply was used (p < 0.001). A similar pattern of risk factors was associated with a decreased likelihood of consuming tap water daily; however, the use of a community water supply was not significant. Understanding the factors involved in drinking water choices could inform public health education efforts regarding water management in rural areas.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202003190029395ZK.pdf 577KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:14次 浏览次数:21次