Evaluating Three Hydrological Distributed Watershed Models: MIKE-SHE, APEX, SWAT

Hydrology

Golmar Golmohammadi¹  Shiv Prasher¹  Ali Madani¹ 

[1] Department of Bioresources Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, QC H9X 3V9, Canada; E-Mails:

关键词: hydrology;    MIKE SHE;    APEX;    SWAT;    Canagagigue;   

DOI  :  10.3390/hydrology1010020

来源: mdpi

【 摘 要 】

Selecting the right model to simulate a specific watershed has always been a challenge, and field testing of watersheds could help researchers to use the proper model for their purposes. The performance of three popular Geographic Information System (GIS)-based watershed simulation models (European Hydrological System Model (MIKE SHE), Agricultural Policy/Environmental Extender (APEX) and Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT)) were evaluated for their ability to simulate the hydrology of the 52.6 km² Canagagigue Watershed located in the Grand River Basin in southern Ontario, Canada. All three models were calibrated for a four-year period and then validated using an independent four-year period by comparing simulated and observed daily, monthly and annual streamflow. The simulated flows generated by the three models are quite similar and closely match the observed flow, particularly for the calibration results. The mean daily/monthly flow at the outlet of the Canagagigue Watershed simulated by MIKE SHE was more accurate than that simulated by either the SWAT or the APEX model, during both the calibration and validation periods. Moreover, for the validation period, MIKE SHE predicted the overall variation of streamflow slightly better than either SWAT or APEX.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.