Journal of Clinical Medicine | |
Pregnancy Loss Following Amniocentesis or CVS Sampling—Time for a Reassessment of Risk | |
Caroline Ogilvie1  | |
[1] Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College, London SE1 9RT, UK | |
关键词: miscarriage; procedure-related pregnancy loss; amniocentesis; chorionic villus sampling (CVS); non-invasive prenatal testing; cell free fetal DNA; | |
DOI : 10.3390/jcm3030741 | |
来源: mdpi | |
【 摘 要 】
Risk of procedure-related pregnancy loss is currently widely quoted in the UK as 1% for amniocentesis and 1.5% for chorionic villus sampling. Published data suggest that these risk figures are out of date and inaccurate, and that new guidelines are required for pre-test counseling. It is our opinion that accurate and evidence-based information concerning miscarriage risk is vital when counseling women, as exaggeration of this risk may deter women from testing, or cause unjustified remorse if a miscarriage ensues. It is also essential that health-care economists are aware of the up-to-date evidence on “procedure-related risk” when applying risk-benefit analysis to assess new technology for non-invasive screening.
【 授权许可】
CC BY
© 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
【 预 览 】
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
RO202003190024644ZK.pdf | 164KB | download |