期刊论文详细信息
Forests
Historical Patterns of Natural Forest Management in Costa Rica: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
J. Pablo Arroyo-Mora1  Sienna Svob1  Margaret Kalacska1 
[1] Department of Geography, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 2K6, Canada; E-Mails:
关键词: selective logging;    natural forest management;    historical patterns;    forest sustainability;    REDD+;    Costa Rica;   
DOI  :  10.3390/f5071777
来源: mdpi
PDF
【 摘 要 】

We present an in-depth analysis of natural forest management practices in Costa Rica based on a new historical forestry GIS database encompassing five conservation regions in the country where selective logging has been prevalent for the last 18 years. Natural forest management refers to the selective logging practices for the production of timber in natural forest ecosystems. The study considers natural forest management plans developed following a standardized format, based on Forestry Law 7575, established in 1996. Our results show a positive aspect of forest management where a large percentage of the managed forest is still standing, contrary to other tropical countries where selective logging promotes land use change. The negative finding is that managed forest areas occur in the last remaining forest fragments outside of protected areas, which challenges the continuity of selective logging in the near and mid future due to the potential impoverishment of the isolated forest stands. The most negative aspect is the recent establishment, by law, of a very short return logging cycle (10–15 years—minimum cutting cycle) as it contradicts ecological studies showing that tropical forests require over 60 years for the forest structure and composition to return to a state similar to pre-logging states. Our results should inform decision makers and managers in conservation areas to review current policies and establish new benchmarks for sustainable forest management in the country.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202003190023608ZK.pdf 15233KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:14次 浏览次数:24次