| Pharmaceutics | |
| Firmness Perception Influences Women’s Preferences for Vaginal Suppositories | |
| Toral Zaveri1  Rachel J. Primrose1  Lahari Surapaneni2  Gregory R. Ziegler2  | |
| [1] Sensory Evaluation Center; The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, 16801 PA, USA E-Mails:;Department of Food Science, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, 16801 PA, USA; E-Mails: | |
| 关键词: microbicide; acceptability; product optimization; sensory perception; semisoft suppository; tenofovir; | |
| DOI : 10.3390/pharmaceutics6030512 | |
| 来源: mdpi | |
PDF
|
|
【 摘 要 】
Microbicides are being actively researched and developed as woman-initiated means to prevent HIV transmission during unprotected coitus. Along with safety and efficacy, assessing and improving compliance is a major area of research in microbicide development. We have developed carrageenan-based semisoft vaginal suppositories and have previously evaluated how physical properties such as firmness, size and shape influence women’s willingness to try them. Firmness has previously been quantified in terms of small-strain storage modulus, G’, however large-strain properties of the gels may also play a role in the firmness perception. In the current study we prepared two sets of suppositories with the same G’ but different elongation properties at four different G’ values (250, 2500, 12,500, 25,000 Pa): For convenience we refer to these as “brittle” and “elastic”, although these terms were never provided to study participants. In the first of two tests conducted to assess preference, women compared pairs of brittle and elastic suppositories and indicated their preference. We observed an interaction, as women preferred brittle suppositories at lower G’ (250, 2500 Pa) and elastic ones at a higher G’ (25,000 Pa). In the second test, women evaluated samples across different G’, rated the
【 授权许可】
CC BY
© 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
【 预 览 】
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
| RO202003190021698ZK.pdf | 905KB |
PDF