期刊论文详细信息
Sensors
Comparison between a Conductometric Biosensor and ELISA in the Evaluation of Johne's Disease
Chika Okafor2  Daniel Grooms2  Evangelyn Alocilja1 
[1] Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA; E-Mail:;Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA; E-Mail:
关键词: biosensor;    conductometric;    diagnosis;    immunosensor;    Johne's disease;    paratuberculosis;   
DOI  :  10.3390/s141019128
来源: mdpi
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Johne's disease (JD), caused by Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis (MAP), is an important gastrointestinal disease of cattle worldwide because of the economic losses encountered in JD-affected herds. These losses include reduction in milk yield in cows, premature culling and reduced carcass weight of culled diseased animals. In the U.S. dairy industry, economic losses from reduced productivity associated with JD are estimated to cost between $200 and $250 million annually. The development of non-laboratory-based assays would support more frequent testing of animals for JD and could improve its control. Conductometric biosensors combine immunomigration technology with electronic signal detection and have been adapted for the detection of IgG antibody against MAP. In the present study, a capture membrane with limited variability in the immunomigration channel and an optimal concentration of the secondary anti-bovine antibody used in a previously developed conductometric biosensor were compared with a commercially available antibody detection ELISA in their evaluation of JD, using samples of serum from cattle whose JD status where unknown. There was a moderate strength of agreement (kappa = 0.41) between the two assays. Findings from this preliminary study support the continued development of conductometric biosensors for use in the diagnosis of JD.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202003190020901ZK.pdf 841KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:6次 浏览次数:13次