From Co-Management to Landscape Governance: Whither Ghana’s Modified Taungya System?

Forests

Mirjam A. F. Ros-Tonen²  Mercy Derkyi¹  Thomas F. G. Insaidoo⁴  Pablo Pacheco³ 

[1] Department of Forest Science, School of Natural Resources, The University of Energy and Natural Resources (UENR), P.O. Box 214, Sunyani, Brong Ahafo Region, Ghana; E-Mail:;Department of Geography, Planning and International Development Studies, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 15629, 1001 NC Amsterdam, The Netherlands;id="af1-forests-05-02996">1Department of Geography, Planning and International Development Studies, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 15629, 1001 NC Amsterdam, The Netherlan;Faculty of Renewable Natural Resources (FRNR), Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST), Kumasi, Ashanti Region, Ghana; E-Mail:

关键词: adaptive co-management;    adaptive governance;    landscape governance;    landscape approach;    social capital;    bridging organisations;    reforestation;    modified taungya system;    Ghana;   

DOI  :  10.3390/f5122996

来源: mdpi

【 摘 要 】

Natural resource management literature has documented three paradigm shifts over the past decade: from co-management to adaptive co-management and adaptive governance respectively and, more recently, towards landscape governance. The latter is conceived as a governance approach towards negotiated land use at the landscape level to deal with global challenges such as food insecurity, climate change and biodiversity loss. There is not a lot of clarity about how co-management systems could actually evolve into landscape governance. This paper aims to address the gap by exploring how a stalled co-management system for the reforestation of degraded forest areas—the modified taungya system (MTS) in Ghana—could be revitalised and redesigned as a landscape approach. Drawing on case studies and expert consultation, the performance of the national MTS and the MTS under the Community Forestry Management Project is reviewed with regard to five principles (integrated approach, multi-stakeholder negotiation, polycentric governance, continual learning and adaptive capacity) and three enabling conditions (social capital, bridging organisations and long-term funding) distilled from the literature. The authors conclude that some of these principles and conditions were met under the Community Forestry Management Project, but that continual learning, transcending jurisdictional boundaries, developing adaptive capacity, and long-term funding and benefits still pose challenges.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.