期刊论文详细信息
Molecules
A Comparison of the Environmental Impact of Different AOPs: Risk Indexes
Jaime Giménez1  Bernardí Bayarri1  Óscar González1  Sixto Malato2  José Peral3  Santiago Esplugas1 
[1] Departament d’Enginyeria Química, Universitat de Barcelona, C/Martí i Franquès 1, Barcelona 08028, Spain; E-Mails:;Plataforma Solar de Almería (CIEMAT), Carretera de Senes, km 4, Tabernas, Almería 04200, Spain; E-Mail:;Departament de Química, Edifici Cn, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Cerdanyola del Vallès 08193, Spain; E-Mail:
关键词: AOPs environmental impact;    risk assessment;    environmental risk indexes;    AOPs comparison;    sustainability;   
DOI  :  10.3390/molecules20010503
来源: mdpi
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Today, environmental impact associated with pollution treatment is a matter of great concern. A method is proposed for evaluating environmental risk associated with Advanced Oxidation Processes (AOPs) applied to wastewater treatment. The method is based on the type of pollution (wastewater, solids, air or soil) and on materials and energy consumption. An Environmental Risk Index (E), constructed from numerical criteria provided, is presented for environmental comparison of processes and/or operations. The Operation Environmental Risk Index (EOi) for each of the unit operations involved in the process and the Aspects Environmental Risk Index (EAj) for process conditions were also estimated. Relative indexes were calculated to evaluate the risk of each operation (E/NOP) or aspect (E/NAS) involved in the process, and the percentage of the maximum achievable for each operation and aspect was found. A practical application of the method is presented for two AOPs: photo-Fenton and heterogeneous photocatalysis with suspended TiO2 in Solarbox. The results report the environmental risks associated with each process, so that AOPs tested and the operations involved with them can be compared.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202003190017916ZK.pdf 783KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:16次 浏览次数:35次