期刊论文详细信息
Sustainability
Sustainability in Land Management: An Analysis of Stakeholder Perceptions in Rural Northern Germany
Andrej Lange1  Rosemarie Siebert2  Tim Barkmann2 
[1]Institute of Socio-Economics, Leibniz Center for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Eberswalder Strasse 84, 15374 Muencheberg, Germany
关键词: sustainable land use;    landscape management;    stakeholder analysis;    qualitative analysis;    semi-structured interview;   
DOI  :  10.3390/su7010683
来源: mdpi
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Successful sustainable land management efforts rely on stakeholder support and integration of stakeholder knowledge. This study explored the views of sustainable land management expressed by land use stakeholders and how these views contribute to land users’ self-perceptions. We examined stakeholder perceptions in four case study areas in rural northern Germany. The target groups consisted of representatives from (i) agriculture; (ii) forestry; (iii) water management and (iv) rural planning and development (“cross-sector” representatives). The data were gathered using 60 semi-structured interviews and were analyzed qualitatively. The results indicate that differences in perceptions are greater between stakeholder groups than between regions; regional land management issues shape the framework of negotiations and the redefinition of concepts, whereas stakeholder group affiliations shape mindsets. The economic dimension of sustainability was emphasized, particularly by land managers; however, the social dimension was underrepresented in the statements. Furthermore, there are considerable differences between stakeholder groups in terms of the ways in which the spatial and temporal scales of sustainable land use are perceived. This study underscores the importance of examining stakeholder knowledge and understanding the complexity of land management and its benefits such that consensual management strategies may be developed.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202003190017461ZK.pdf 924KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:12次 浏览次数:29次