Energies | |
Monetization of External Costs Using Lifecycle Analysis—A Comparative Case Study of Coal-Fired and Biomass Power Plants in Northeast China | |
Lingling Wang2  Tsunemi Watanabe3  Zhiwei Xu1  | |
[1] State Grid Heilongjiang Electric Power Company Limited, 301 Hanshui Road, Nangang District, Harbin 150090, China; E-Mail:;Graduate School of Engineering, Kochi University of Technology, Miyanokuchi 185, Tosayamada-cho, Kami City, Kochi 782-0003, Japan; E-Mail:;School of Management, Kochi University of Technology, Miyanokuchi 185, Tosayamada-cho, Kami City, Kochi 782-0003, Japan | |
关键词: external cost; coal-fired power plant; biomass power plan; lifecycle; | |
DOI : 10.3390/en8021440 | |
来源: mdpi | |
【 摘 要 】
In this study, the structures of external costs are built in line with coal-fired and biomass power plant life cycle activities in Northeast China. The external cost of coal-fired and biomass power plants was compared, using the lifecycle approach. In addition, the external costs of a biomass power plant are calculated for each stage for comparison with those of a coal-fired power plant. The results highlight that the external costs of a coal-fired plant are 0.072 US $/kWh, which are much higher than that of a biomass power plant, 0.00012 US$/kWh. The external cost of coal-fired power generation is as much as 90% of the current price of electricity generated by coal, while the external cost of a biomass power plant is 1/1000 of the current price of electricity generated by biomass. In addition, for a biomass power plant, the external cost associated with SO2, NO
【 授权许可】
CC BY
© 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
【 预 览 】
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
RO202003190016423ZK.pdf | 1751KB | download |