期刊论文详细信息
Remote Sensing
Accuracy Assessment of LiDAR-Derived Digital Elevation Models Based on Approximation Theory
XiaoHang Liu2  Hai Hu1  Peng Hu1  Richard Müller3 
[1] School of Resource and Environment Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China; E-Mail:;Department of Geography and Environment, San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94132, USA; E-Mail:;Department of Geography and Environment, San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94132, USA; E-Mail
关键词: LiDAR;    DEM;    accuracy;    approximation theory;    error;   
DOI  :  10.3390/rs70607062
来源: mdpi
PDF
【 摘 要 】

The cumulative error at a point in a LiDAR-derived DEM consists of three components: propagated LiDAR-sensor error, propagated ground error, and interpolation error. To combine these error components so as to assess the vertical accuracy of a LiDAR-derived DEM, statistical methods based on the error propagation theory are often used. Due to the existence of systematic error, statistical methods are only effective if a large number of checkpoints are available, which may not be affordable in many practical applications. This paper presents approximation theory as an alternative methodology that departs from error propagation theory in fundamental ways. Using approximation theory, an error bound of the cumulative error at any point in the study site can be obtained, thus informing users conservatively of the spatial variation of DEM accuracy and pointing out the weakly determined areas. The new method is illustrated from DEM users’ perspective by assessing whether a publicly available LiDAR-derived DEM meets FEMA’s accuracy standard for flood risk mapping. The paper calls for a change in the existing methods of assessing and reporting the errors in a LiDAR-derived DEM, in particular those introduced during the ground filtering process.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202003190011916ZK.pdf 736KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:12次 浏览次数:21次