期刊论文详细信息
Water
Field Evaluation of a Stormwater Treatment Train with Pit Baskets and Filter Media Cartridges in Southeast Queensland
Darren Drapper1  Andy Hornbuckle2 
[1] Drapper Environmental Consultants (DEC), 12 Treetops Avenue, Springfield Lakes 4300, QLD, Australia;SPEL Environmental (SPEL), 96 Cobalt St, Carole Park 4300, QLD, Australia; E-Mail:
关键词: stormwater;    monitoring;    protocols;    suspended solids;    nitrogen;    phosphorus;    filters;   
DOI  :  10.3390/w7084496
来源: mdpi
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Field monitoring of a stormwater treatment train has been underway between November 2013 and May 2015 at a townhouse development located at Ormiston, southeast Queensland. The research was undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of a 200 micron mesh pit basket in a 900 square format and an 850 mm high media filtration cartridge system for removing total suspended solids and nutrients from stormwater runoff. The monitoring protocol was developed with Queensland University of Technology (QUT), reflecting the Auckland Regional Council Proprietary Device Evaluation Protocol (PDEP) and United States Urban Stormwater BMP Performance Monitoring Manual with some minor improvements reflecting local conditions. During the 18 month period, more than 30 rain events have occurred, of which nine comply with the protocol. The Efficiency Ratio (ER) observed for the treatment devices are 32% total suspended solids (TSS), 37% for total phosphorus (TP) and 38% total nitrogen (TN) for the pit basket, and an Efficiency Ratio of 87% TSS, 55% TP and 42% TN for the cartridge filter. The performance results on nine events have been observed to be significantly different statistically (p < 0.05) for the filters but not the pit baskets. The research has also identified the significant influence of analytical variability on performance results, specifically when influent concentrations are near the limits of detection.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202003190007728ZK.pdf 1854KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:12次 浏览次数:38次