期刊论文详细信息
Sustainability
Decision Making on Allocating Urban Green Spaces Based upon Spatially-Varying Relationships between Urban Green Spaces and Urban Compaction Degree
Hsueh-Sheng Chang2  Tzu-Ling Chen1 
[1] Department of Urban Planning, National Cheng-Kung University, 1 University Road, Tainan City 70101, Taiwan; E-Mail
关键词: compact city;    degree of urban compaction;    urban green spaces (UGS);    geographically weighted regression (GWR);   
DOI  :  10.3390/su71013399
来源: mdpi
PDF
【 摘 要 】

The compact city is becoming a prevailing paradigm in the world to control urban sprawl and achieve a pattern of sustainable urban development. However, discussions of the area's overcrowded neighborhoods, its health problems, and the destruction of its green areas have inspired self-examination with respect to the compact city paradigm. High population density attracts even more residents and frequently renders the existing urban green space (UGS) insufficient for use as part of a living environment. Due to the unique benefits that these qualities confer, UGS allocation is now considered a significant contributing factor to urban livability. In addition, the UGS allocation may be different due to the presence of many spatial non-stationarity processes. Therefore, this study employs geographically-weighted regression (GWR) to explore the unique and spatially-explicit relationships between the degree of urban compaction and UGS within the Taipei metropolitan area. Maps summarizing the GWR results demonstrate that there is significantly insufficient UGS allocation in the central area, which consists mainly of Taipei City. Townships with higher parameters contain UGS levels that better meet the needs of their residents. Overall, the exploration of conceptualizing spatial heterogeneity of relationships between the degree of urban compaction and UGS can provide insightful analyses for decision-making on allocating UGS.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202003190005645ZK.pdf 2836KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:7次 浏览次数:1次