期刊论文详细信息
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Indoor Environmental Quality in Mechanically Ventilated, Energy-Efficient Buildings vs. Conventional Buildings
Peter Wallner1  Ute Munoz4  Peter Tappler4  Anna Wanka2  Michael Kundi1  Janie F. Shelton1  Hans-Peter Hutter1  Gary Adamkiewicz3 
[1] Institute of Environmental Health, Center for Public Health, Medical University Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 15, Vienna 1090, Austria; E-Mails:;Institute of Sociology, University Vienna, Austria, Alserbachstraße 5, Vienna 1090, Austria; E-Mail:Institute of Environmental Health, Center for Public Health, Medical University Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 15, Vienna 1090, Austria;;Austrian Institute for Healthy and Ecological Building, Alserbachstraße 5, Vienna 1090, Austria; E-Mails:
关键词: energy-efficient buildings;    indoor air quality;    measurements;    mechanical ventilation;    natural ventilation;   
DOI  :  10.3390/ijerph121114132
来源: mdpi
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Energy-efficient buildings need mechanical ventilation. However, there are concerns that inadequate mechanical ventilation may lead to impaired indoor air quality. Using a semi-experimental field study, we investigated if exposure of occupants of two types of buildings (mechanical vs. natural ventilation) differs with regard to indoor air pollutants and climate factors. We investigated living and bedrooms in 123 buildings (62 highly energy-efficient and 61 conventional buildings) built in the years 2010 to 2012 in Austria (mainly Vienna and Lower Austria). Measurements of indoor parameters (climate, chemical pollutants and biological contaminants) were conducted twice. In total, more than 3000 measurements were performed. Almost all indoor air quality and room climate parameters showed significantly better results in mechanically ventilated homes compared to those relying on ventilation from open windows and/or doors. This study does not support the hypothesis that occupants in mechanically ventilated low energy houses are exposed to lower indoor air quality.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202003190003886ZK.pdf 171KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:8次 浏览次数:21次