期刊论文详细信息
Forests
Managed Mixtures of Aspen and White Spruce 21 to 25 Years after Establishment
Richard Kabzems1  Mike Bokalo2  Philip G. Comeau2  Daniel A. MacIsaac3 
[1] British Columbia Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations, Northeast Region, 9000 17th Street, Dawson, BC V1G 4A4, CanadaDepartment of Renewable Resources, 751 General Services Building, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H1, Canada;Canadian Wood Fibre Centre, Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada, 5320-122 Street, Edmonton, AB T6H 3S5, Canada;
关键词: trembling aspen;    white spruce;    boreal mixedwoods;    species mixtures;   
DOI  :  10.3390/f7010005
来源: mdpi
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Intimate mixtures of trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) and white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss) are a key feature of western Canadian boreal forests. These mixtures have the potential to produce high yields of merchantable fibre and provide numerous ecological services. Achievement of this potential has been difficult, and often expensive, to realize as a regeneration goal in managed forests. We report 21 to 25 year results of managed mixtures on two study sites where the white spruce was planted, and the density of aspen natural regeneration manipulated within five years of the stand initiation disturbance. On both sites, white spruce mortality did not increase with increasing aspen density. While height and diameter growth of white spruce declined with increasing aspen density, the effect was not entirely consistent across the two sites. Abrasion from aspen branches was the most common source of damage to spruce crowns. Mixed stands had greater merchantable volume production than pure spruce stands based on model projections. Application of aspen harvest at year 60, while protecting the spruce component for a second harvest entry at year 90, was projected to optimize combined yield for the mixedwood stands.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202003190000998ZK.pdf 595KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:23次 浏览次数:17次