期刊论文详细信息
International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology
Effect of Gleason scores of lymph node metastases on prognosis of patients with prostate cancer
Choung-Soo Kim1  In Gab Jeong1  Ja Hee Suh1  Kyungtae Ko1  Ju Hyun Lim1  Kyung Cheol Moon1  Hyeon Hoe Kim1  Cheol Kwak1  Ja Hyeon Ku1  Woo Suk Choi1  Yangsoon Park1 
关键词: Gleason score;    prognosis;    lymph node metastasis;    prostate cancer;    radical prostatectomy;   
DOI  :  
学科分类:生理学与病理学
来源: e-Century Publishing Corporation
PDF
【 摘 要 】

The long-term mortality risk from prostate cancer increases in lymph node (LN) positive patients. This study was done to assess the effect of lymph node Gleason score (LNGS) on prognosis in patients with LN-positive prostate cancer. Among the 1,415 patients who received pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND), 117 (8.4%) patients had a positive LN. The PGS of the prostate specimens and the LNGS of the positive LNs were assessed by uropathologists. The median age of patients at surgery was 67 years (interquartile range [IQR], 62-71 years) and the median follow-up duration was 44.3 months (IQR, 27.0-78.5 months). Pathologic Gleason scores (PGS) of 6-9 included one (0.9%), 53 (49.5%), 22 (20.6%), and 31 (29.0%) patients. The median total number of retrieved LNs was 9.0 (IQR, 5.3-12.8). The median number of positive LNs was one (IQR, 1-2). Cancer architecture with a Gleason pattern and score were observed in LNs as in ordinary prostate specimens. LNGS 6-9 included nine (8.1%), 57 (51.4%), 31 (27.9%), and 14 (12.6%) patients. The speaman’s analysis showed the meaningful correlation between PGS and LNGS (P = 0.249, P = 0.011). The univariate analysis showed that the number of positive LNs and LNGS were significantly associated with prostate cancer-specific survival (P = 0.028; P = 0.005). The same architecture that is seen in the prostate was seen in positive LNs, and LNGS may be a significant prognostic factor in patients with LN-positive prostate cancer.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO201912140867209ZK.pdf 1257KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:8次 浏览次数:8次