Using movements, genetics and trophic ecology to differentiate inshore from offshore aggregations of humpback whales in the Gulf of Alaska

Endangered Species Research

Christine M. Gabriele¹  Janet Neilson¹  Debbie Steel¹  Jay Barlow¹  Ellen Chenoweth¹  C. Scott Baker¹  Briana H. Witteveen¹  Jan M. Straley¹  Alexander G. Andrews¹  Amy Hirons¹  Craig Matkin¹  Olga von Ziegesar¹ 

关键词: Pinniped;    Australian sea lion;    Endangered;    Demersal gillnet;    Operational ­interaction;    Bycatch mortality;    Foraging behaviour;    Marine protected area;   

DOI  :  10.3354/esr00351

学科分类：动物科学

来源: Inter-Research

【 摘 要 】

ABSTRACT: Humpback whales Megaptera novaeangliae have been studied in the coastal waters of the Gulf of Alaska (GOA) since the late 1960s, but information about whales foraging offshore is limited. A large-scale collaborative project (SPLASH) provided opportunities to study humpback whales in both inshore and offshore habitats. Using identification photographs and biopsy samples, we explored individual movements, the distribution of mitochondrial (mtDNA) haplotypes, and trophic levels for humpback whales within 3 regions (Kodiak, KOD; Prince William Sound, PWS; and southeastern Alaska, SEAK) of the GOA to determine whether inshore and offshore aggregations of humpback whales are distinct. Each region was divided into inshore and offshore habitats, creating 6 subregions for comparison. Results documenting 2136 individual whales showed that movement within the study area was most frequent between inshore and offshore subregions within a region. In general, movement between regions was minimal. Tissue samples of 483 humpback whales included 15 mtDNA haplotypes. Pairwise chi-squared tests showed haplotype differences between subregions, but inshore PWS was the only subregion with a haplotype composition significantly different than all other subregions. Trophic levels, as inferred from stable nitrogen isotope ratios, were significantly different among subregions, ranging from 3.4 to 4.5. Pairwise comparisons showed that inshore PWS was again the only subregion that significantly differed from all others. Results suggest that the combined inshore and offshore habitats for KOD and the inshore and offshore habitats for SEAK should each be considered as single regional feeding aggregations, while inshore PWS may represent a separate aggregation from PWS offshore.

【 授权许可】

Unknown