期刊论文详细信息
Revista Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia
Cochlear anatomy study used to design surgical instruments for cochlear implants with two bundles of electrodes in ossified cochleas
Tsuji, Robinson Koji1  Bogar, Mariana1  Bento, Ricardo Ferreira1  Universidade de São Paulo1 
关键词: internal carotid artery;    ossified cochlea;    double array;    cochlear implant.;   
DOI  :  10.1590/S0034-72992008000200007
学科分类:医学(综合)
来源: Associacao Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cervicofacial
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Cochlear ossification, mainly secondary to meningitis, prevents the complete conventional cochlear implant insertion. Implants with two electrode bundles shorter than the conventional ones were specifically developed for ossified cochleas. However, during surgery there is a high risk of damaging the internal carotid artery (ICA). Therefore, measuring cochleostomy depth in order to insert the two electrode bundles would greatly increase the procedureÂ’s safety. AIMS: 1) Find the distances between cochleostomies and ICA in cadaver temporal bones. 2) Design an instrument that can be used in cochlear implant surgery to introduce an implant with two bundles of electrodes. STUDY DESIGN: Experimental prospective. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 21 temporal bones from cadavers we performed: 1) canal wall down mastoidectomy; 2) cochleostomy in the cochlear basal and middle turns; 3) ICA identification; 4) Length determination between the cochleostomies and the artery. RESULTS: the average distance ± standard deviation obtained for the upper tunnel was of 8.2 ± 1.1 mm and for the lower tunnel it was of 8.1± 1.3 mm. The shortest distance found was of 6.5 mm for the upper tunnel and 6.0 mm for the lower tunnel. CONCLUSION: Despite the values calculated, we concluded that the best value to be considered in creating a surgical instrument are the minimum lengths obtained for each one of the cochlear turns, because this is the safest way to avoid damaging the ICA, that can be fatal.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO201912050602771ZK.pdf 119KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:11次 浏览次数:6次