| Innovations in Clinical Neuroscience | |
| Do the Five Combinations of Suicidal Ideation in the FDA 2012 Draft Guidance Document and the C–SSRS Adequately Cover All Suicidal Ideation Combinations in Practice? A Case Study | |
| Jennifer M. Giddens1  David V. Sheehan1  | |
| [1] J. Giddens is Co-founder of the Tampa Center for Research on Suicidality, Tampa, Florida; and Dr. Sheehan is Distinguished University Health Professor Emeritus, University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida. | |
| 关键词: Suicide scale; suicide assessment; suicide risk; suicide attempt; suicide; suicidal ideation; suicidal behavior; suicidality; C–SSRS; FDA 2012 Draft Guidance Document; | |
| DOI : | |
| 学科分类:精神健康和精神病学 | |
| 来源: Matrix Medical Communications, LLC | |
PDF
|
|
【 摘 要 】
Objective: The United States Food and Drug Administration’s newest classification system for suicidality assessment anchors suicidal ideation to various combinations of passive suicidal ideation, active suicidal ideation, method, intent, and plan. This is based upon the suicidal ideation categories in the Columbia–Suicide Severity Rating Scale. Although there are 32 possible combinations of these suicidal ideation phenomena, the Food and Drug Administration’s 2012 system and the Columbia–Suicide Severity Rating Scale accommodate six combinations. We use a case study to explore the impact of possible type II errors on suicidality classification posed by not including remaining 26 possible categories.
【 授权许可】
Unknown
【 预 览 】
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
| RO201912040560788ZK.pdf | 91KB |
PDF