A Review of Clinical Data for Currently Approved Hysteroscopic Sterilization Procedures

Reviews in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cindy M Basinski¹ 

[1] Basinski, LLC, Newburgh, IN

关键词: Essure;    Adiana;    Hysteroscopic sterilization;    Transcervical sterilization;   

DOI  :  

学科分类：医学（综合）

来源: MedReviews, LLC

【 摘 要 】

Two hysteroscopic permanent sterilization procedures are approved for use in the United States: Essure® Permanent Birth Control System (Conceptus Incorporated, Mountain View, CA) and Adiana® Permanent Contraception (Hologic, Inc., Bedford, MA). This review compares the clinical trial data for these procedures. A notable difference is the resultant clinical pregnancy risk. The clinical trials for the Essure procedure have reported no pregnancies in 643 relying women in the 9 years since initiation of the studies. The clinical trial for the Adiana procedure has reported 12 pregnancies in 570 relying women in nearly 5 years of collected data. Other clinical outcome parameters concerning Essure and Adiana are examined in this review.

【 授权许可】

Unknown