Simple Cystatin C Formula Compared to Serum Creatinine-Based Formulas for Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate in Patients with Mildly to Moderately Impaired Kidney Function

Kidney and Blood Pressure Research

Ekart R.²  Hojs R.²  Bevc S.²  Gorenjak M.³  Puklavec L.¹ 

[1] Nephrology and $$;Department of Clinical Chemistry, University Medical Center Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia$$

关键词: 51Cr-EDTA clearance;    Serum creatinine-based equations;    Serum cystatin C-based equation;    Chronic kidney disease;    Glomerular filtration rate;   

DOI  :  10.1159/000341918

来源: S Karger AG

【 摘 要 】

Background: Serum cystatin C (SCC)-based formulas and the newer creatinine formula (the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration formula (CKD-EPI)) were proposed as improved glomerular filtration rate (GFR) markers. The aim of our study was to compare serum creatinine (SCr)-based and SCC-based equations against ⁵¹Cr-EDTA clearance in patients with mildly to moderately impaired kidney function. Methods: 255 adult Caucasian patients with chronic kidney disease (GFR 89–30 ml/min/1.73 m²) were enrolled. In each patient, ⁵¹Cr-EDTA clearance, SCr and SCC were determined. GFR was calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault (C&G), Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD), CKD-EPI formulas and simple cystatin C formula (SCCF) (100/SCC). Results: The receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis (cut-off for GFR 60 ml/min/1.73 m²) showed that the SCCF had a higher diagnostic accuracy than C&G but not than MDRD or CKD-EPI formulas. The Bland-Altman analysis for the same cut-off value showed that creatinine formulas underestimated and SCCF overestimated the measured GFR. Analysis of ability to correctly predict a patient’s GFR <60 or >60 ml/min/1.73 m² showed the higher ability for the SCCF compared to all creatinine-based formulas. Conclusion: Our results indicate that the SCCF is a reliable marker of GFR and comparable to creatinine formulas including the CKD-EPI formula.

【 授权许可】

Unknown