FEBS Letters | |
The intact urokinase receptor is required for efficient vitronectin binding: receptor cleavage prevents ligand interaction | |
Preissner, Klaus T2  Høyer-Hansen, Gunilla1  Behrendt, Niels1  Danø, Keld1  Ploug, Michael1  | |
[1] Finsen Laboratory, Rigshospitalet, Strandboulevarden 49, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø., Denmark;Max-Planck-Institut, Haemostasis Research Unit, Kerckhoff-Klinik, D-61231 Bad Nauheim, Germany | |
关键词: Receptor cleavage; Urokinase; Urokinase receptor; Vitronectin; Real-time biomolecular interaction analysis; uPA; urokinase-type plasminogen activator; pro-uPA; pro-enzyme form of uPA; uPAR; uPA receptor; uPAR(2+3); uPAR containing only domains 2 and 3; suPAR; soluble form of uPAR; PAI-1; plasminogen activator inhibitor 1; DFP; diisopropyl fluorophosphate; RU; resonance unit; Mab; monoclonal antibody; | |
DOI : 10.1016/S0014-5793(97)01491-9 | |
学科分类:生物化学/生物物理 | |
来源: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. | |
【 摘 要 】
The urokinase receptor (uPAR) is a receptor for both urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) and the adhesion protein vitronectin. There are two forms of cell surface-bound uPAR; intact uPAR and a cleaved form, uPAR(2+3), which is formed by uPA-catalyzed cleavage of uPAR. In ligand-blotting experiments we found that vitronectin binds uPAR but not uPAR(2+3). In real-time biomolecular interaction analysis using recombinant, soluble uPAR (suPAR) both plasma and multimeric forms of vitronectin bound to intact, antibody-immobilized suPAR. Monoclonal antibodies against domain 1 of uPAR blocked suPAR binding to vitronectin and vitronectin did not interact with suPAR(2+3). Both suPAR(2+3) and the isolated domain 1 failed to compete with the intact suPAR in binding to vitronectin. We therefore conclude that the intact receptor is required for efficient vitronectin binding.
【 授权许可】
Unknown
【 预 览 】
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
RO201912020305373ZK.pdf | 341KB | download |