期刊论文详细信息
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
Economics and industry do not mean ethical conduct in clinical trials
Joel Lexchin1 
[1] 1School of Health Policy and Management, York University, 4700 Keele St., Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3, Canada
关键词: Clinical trials;    Developing countries;    Ethics;    Ghost writing;    Pharmaceutical industry;    Seeding trials;    Withholding data;   
DOI  :  10.1186/2052-3211-6-11
学科分类:药理学
来源: BioMed Central
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Clinical trials present an ethical dilemma for pharmaceutical companies. While companies may want to undertake and report these trials in an ethical manner, negative results can significantly affect product sales. There is accumulating evidence that company-financed trials are biased in favor of the product that the company makes. Ethical conduct in this article is defined as whether the trials are conducted in the best interests of the participants and/or reported in the best interests of patients. Nine examples of how clinical trials are violating multiple articles in the Declaration of Helsinki are discussed using concrete case reports from the literature. The recognition of ethical problems in company run trials is not something new, but to date no meaningful action has been taken to resolve this issue. What is necessary is to separate the financing of clinical trials from their conduct.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO201912010260012ZK.pdf 297KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:10次 浏览次数:8次