期刊论文详细信息
Journal of Strategic Security
In Their Own Words? Methodological Considerations in the Analysis of Terrorist Autobiographies
Horgan, John1  Thoroughgood, Christian2  Altier, Mary Beth2 
[1] International Center for the Study of Terrorism, Pennsylvania State UniversityInternational Center for the Study of Terrorism, Pennsylvania State UniversityInternational Center for the Study of Terrorism, Pennsylvania State University;Pennsylvania State UniversityPennsylvania State UniversityPennsylvania State University
关键词: Armed groups;    Terrorism / counterterrorism;   
DOI  :  10.5038/1944-0472.5.4.6
学科分类:建筑学
来源: Henley-Putnam University Press
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Despite the growth of terrorism literature in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, there remain several methodological challenges to studying certain aspects of terrorism. This is perhaps most evident in attempts to uncover the attitudes, motivations, and intentions of individuals engaged in violent extremism and how they are sometimes expressed in problematic behavior. Such challenges invariably stem from the fact that terrorists and the organizations to which they belong represent clandestine populations engaged in illegal activity. Unsurprisingly, these qualities make it difficult for the researcher to identify and locate willing subjects of studylet alone a representative sample. In this research note, we suggest the systematic analysis of terrorist autobiographies offers a promising means of investigating difficult-to-study areas of terrorism-related phenomena. Investigation of autobiographical accounts not only offers additional data points for the study of individual psychological issues, but also provides valuable perspectives on the internal structures, processes, and dynamics of terrorist organizations more broadly. Moreover, given most autobiographies cover critical events and personal experiences across the life course, they provide a unique lens into how terrorists perceive their world and insight into their decision-making processes. We support our advocacy of this approach by highlighting its methodological strengths and shortcomings.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO201912010204796ZK.pdf 283KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:13次 浏览次数:6次