期刊论文详细信息
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Combined 18F-Fluoride and 18F-FDG PET/CT Scanning for Evaluation of Malignancy: Results of an International Multicenter Trial
Camila Mosci1  David W. Dick1  Victor Iyer1  Paula Lapa1  Vineet Prakash1  Andrei Iagaru1  Jorge Isidoro1  Sanjiv Sam Gambhir1  Mike Sathekge1  Erik Mittra1  Joao M. de Lima1 
关键词: 18F−;    18F-FDG;    PET/CT;    cancer;   
DOI  :  10.2967/jnumed.112.108803
学科分类:医学(综合)
来源: Society of Nuclear Medicine
PDF
【 摘 要 】

18F-FDG PET/CT is used in a variety of cancers, but because of variable rates of glucose metabolism, not all cancers are reliably identified. 18F− PET/CT allows for the acquisition of highly sensitive and specific images of the skeleton. We prospectively evaluated combined 18F−/18F-FDG as a single PET/CT examination for evaluation of cancer patients and compared it with separate 18F− PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT scans. Methods: One hundred fifteen participants with cancer were prospectively enrolled in an international multicenter trial evaluating 18F− PET/CT, 18F-FDG PET/CT, and combined 18F−/18F-FDG PET/CT. The 3 PET/CT scans were performed sequentially within 4 wk of one another for each patient. Results: 18F−/18F-FDG PET/CT allowed for accurate interpretation of radiotracer uptake outside the skeleton, with findings similar to those of 18F-FDG PET/CT. In 19 participants, skeletal disease was more extensive on 18F− PET/CT and 18F−/18F-FDG PET/CT than on 18F-FDG PET/CT. In another 29 participants, 18F− PET/CT and 18F−/18F-FDG PET/CT showed osseous metastases where 18F-FDG PET/CT was negative. The extent of skeletal lesions was similar in 18 participants on all 3 scans. Conclusion: This trial demonstrated that combined 18F−/18F-FDG PET/CT shows promising results when compared with separate 18F− PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT for evaluation of cancer patients. This result opens the possibility for improved patient care and reduction in health-care costs, as will be further evaluated in future trials.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO201912010198676ZK.pdf 798KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:33次 浏览次数:20次