Role of O-(2-18F-Fluoroethyl)-l-Tyrosine PET for Differentiation of Local Recurrent Brain Metastasis from Radiation Necrosis

Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Hans Herzog¹  Heinz H. Coenen¹  Norbert Galldiks¹  Marc D. Piroth¹  Christian P. Filss¹  Gereon R. Fink¹  Karl-Josef Langen¹  Gabriele Stoffels¹  Nadim J. Shah¹  Maximilian I. Ruge¹  Michael Sabel¹ 

关键词: radiation necrosis;    stereotactic radiosurgery;    recurrent brain metastasis;    amino acid PET;    ¹⁸F-fluoroethyl-L-tyrosine (¹⁸F-FET);   

DOI  :  10.2967/jnumed.112.103325

学科分类：医学（综合）

来源: Society of Nuclear Medicine

【 摘 要 】

The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine (18F-FET) PET for differentiating local recurrent brain metastasis from radiation necrosis after radiation therapy because the use of contrast-enhanced MRI for this issue is often difficult. Methods: Thirty-one patients (mean age ± SD, 53 ± 11 y) with single or multiple contrast-enhancing brain lesions (n = 40) on MRI after radiation therapy of brain metastases were investigated with dynamic 18F-FET PET. Maximum and mean tumor-to-brain ratios (TBRmax and TBRmean, respectively; 20–40 min after injection) of 18F-FET uptake were determined. Time–activity curves were generated, and the time to peak (TTP) was calculated. Furthermore, time–activity curves of each lesion were assigned to one of the following curve patterns: (I) constantly increasing 18F-FET uptake, (II) 18F-FET uptake peaking early (TTP ≤ 20 min) followed by a plateau, and (III) 18F-FET uptake peaking early (TTP ≤ 20 min) followed by a constant descent. The diagnostic accuracy of the TBRmax and TBRmean of 18F-FET uptake and the curve patterns for the correct identification of recurrent brain metastasis were evaluated by receiver-operating-characteristic analyses or Fisher exact test for 2 × 2 contingency tables using subsequent histologic analysis (11 lesions in 11 patients) or clinical course and MRI findings (29 lesions in 20 patients) as reference. Results: Both TBRmax and TBRmean were significantly higher in patients with recurrent metastasis (n = 19) than in patients with radiation necrosis (n = 21) (TBRmax, 3.2 ± 0.9 vs. 2.3 ± 0.5, P < 0.001; TBRmean, 2.1 ± 0.4 vs. 1.8 ± 0.2, P < 0.001). The diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FET PET for the correct identification of recurrent brain metastases reached 78% using TBRmax (area under the ROC curve [AUC], 0.822 ± 0.07; sensitivity, 79%; specificity, 76%; cutoff, 2.55; P = 0.001), 83% using TBRmean (AUC, 0.851 ± 0.07; sensitivity, 74%; specificity, 90%; cutoff, 1.95; P < 0.001), and 92% for curve patterns II and III versus curve pattern I (sensitivity, 84%; specificity, 100%; P < 0.0001). The highest accuracy (93%) to diagnose local recurrent metastasis was obtained when both a TBRmean greater than 1.9 and curve pattern II or III were present (AUC, 0.959 ± 0.03; sensitivity, 95%; specificity, 91%; P < 0.001). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the combined evaluation of the TBRmean of 18F-FET uptake and the pattern of the time–activity curve can differentiate local brain metastasis recurrence from radionecrosis with high accuracy. 18F-FET PET may thus contribute significantly to the management of patients with brain metastases.

【 授权许可】

Unknown