期刊论文详细信息
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Diagnostic Value of 18F-FDG PET for Evaluation of Paraaortic Nodal Metastasis in Patients with Cervical Carcinoma: A Metaanalysis
Byung-Ho Nam1  Sang-Yoon Park1  Seok-Ki Kim1  Sokbom Kang1  Joo-Young Kim1  Sang-Soo Seo1  Dae-Chul Chung1 
关键词: cervical neoplasm;    18F-FDG PET;    lymph node staging;    paraaortic metastasis;    positron emission tomography;    surgical staging;   
DOI  :  10.2967/jnumed.109.066217
学科分类:医学(综合)
来源: Society of Nuclear Medicine
PDF
【 摘 要 】

We assessed the diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET in detecting paraaortic lymph node (PALN) metastasis in patients with cervical cancer. Methods: Through a search of MEDLINE and EMBASE (1980 to March 2009), we performed a random-effects metaanalysis. A summary receiver-operating-characteristic curve was constructed using hierarchical regression models. To identify other sources of heterogeneity, regression metaanalysis was performed. Results: Patients (n = 385) from 10 studies were analyzed. Although specificity of 18F-FDG PET was consistent (97%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 93%−99%), sensitivity was low and heterogeneous among the studies (34%; 95% CI, 10%−72%). Although regression metaanalysis did not identify any source to which heterogeneity could be attributed, it revealed a trend of increasing sensitivity according to an increase in the prevalence of PALN metastasis (P = 0.001). In the 5 studies with prevalence greater than 15%, estimated sensitivity and specificity were 73% (95% CI, 53%−87%) and 93% (95% CI, 86%−97%), respectively. With the diagnostic performance, assuming the prevalence of 15%, the calculated false-positive and -negative rates were 35% and 5%, respectively. Conclusion: In detecting PALN metastasis, PET performs acceptably only in populations with a relatively high probability of PALN metastasis. Otherwise, we found no evidence to justify the evaluation of PALN based solely on PET in cervical cancer.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO201912010197683ZK.pdf 1267KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:8次 浏览次数:10次