期刊论文详细信息
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
18F-FDG PET Can Replace Conventional Work-up in Primary M Staging of Nonkeratinizing Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Shy-Chyi Chin1  Shu-Hang Ng1  Chien-Yu Lin1  Chun-Ta Liao1  Tzu-Chen Yen1  Hung-Ming Wang1  Sheng-Chieh Chan1  Joseph T. Chang1  Feng-Yuan Liu1 
关键词: 18F-FDG PET;    nasopharyngeal carcinoma;    staging;    distant metastasis;   
DOI  :  10.2967/jnumed.107.043406
学科分类:医学(综合)
来源: Society of Nuclear Medicine
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Conventional work-up (CWU) with chest radiography, abdominal ultrasonography, and skeletal scintigraphy has limited value in M staging of nonkeratinizing nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Our aim was to evaluate whether 18F-FDG PET could replace CWU by comparing their diagnostic efficacies. Methods: Patients with histologically proven nonkeratinizing NPC and no prior treatment were prospectively enrolled. All study participants underwent CWU and 18F-FDG PET for primary M staging. Distant metastasis was considered to be present if there was any reliable evidence identified within 1 y after diagnosis. The comparative diagnostic efficacies of 18F-FDG PET, CWU, and the combination of 18F-FDG PET and CWU (PET+CWU) were evaluated using the areas under the receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curves. Results: Sixty-one (20.3%) of 300 eligible patients were found to have distant metastases. On a patient-based analysis, 18F-FDG PET was found to be more effective than CWU (P < 0.001), whereas it was equally effective with PET+CWU (P = 0.130). On region-based analyses, 18F-FDG PET was more effective than skeletal scintigraphy and chest radiography for detecting bone metastases (P < 0.001) and chest metastases (P < 0.001), respectively. 18F-FDG PET and abdominal ultrasound were equally effective for detecting hepatic metastases (P = 0.127). On region-based analyses, the combination of 18F-FDG PET and CWU did not yield any noticeable increase in diagnostic efficacy. Conclusion: 18F-FDG PET can replace CWU in primary M staging of nonkeratinizing NPC.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO201912010196779ZK.pdf 686KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:10次 浏览次数:16次