Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology | |
Experiences with Citrate Rather Than Heparin as an Anticoagulant for 18F-FDG Labeling of Leukocytes | |
Randi Moen Forfang1  Signe E. Hagve1  Merethe Wigen Andersen1  Charlotte Eldjarn1  Kjell Rootwelt1  | |
关键词: 18F-FDG–labeled leukocytes; 18F-FDG–labeled white blood cells; inflammation imaging; vascular graft infection; | |
DOI : 10.2967/jnmt.110.085464 | |
学科分类:医学(综合) | |
来源: Society of Nuclear Medicine | |
【 摘 要 】
In all reported clinical studies with 18F-FDG–labeled leukocytes, heparin was used as an anticoagulant during labeling. Theoretically, the substitution of heparin with citrate should be advantageous. Methods: Blood from healthy controls was sampled in duplicate, anticoagulated with citrate or heparin, and labeled with 18F-FDG, and the labeling yield was measured. Viability was checked with the trypan blue exclusion technique. Moreover, 4 in vivo PET/CT studies were performed after the reinjection of leukocytes labeled after citrate anticoagulation. Results: The labeling yields obtained with citrate and heparin were not significantly different (P = 0.447). Viability was greater than or equal to 99%. The quality of the PET/CT studies was excellent. In the in vivo studies, the mean labeling yield was 78%better than or equal to that reported with heparin as an anticoagulant. Conclusion: Citrate is at least as effective as heparin as an anticoagulant, does not (unlike heparin) increase granulocyte activation, and should be the preferred anticoagulant for 18F-FDG labeling of leukocytes.
【 授权许可】
Unknown
【 预 览 】
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
RO201912010179755ZK.pdf | 514KB | download |