期刊论文详细信息
Planta Daninha
Herbicides selectivity on seedlings of native species Acacia polyphylla, Enterolobium contortisiliquum (Fabaceae), Ceiba speciosa and Luehea divaricata (Malvaceae)
Hirata, A.C.S.1  APTA1  Monquero, P.A.1  Penha, A.S.1  Orzari, I.1  Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Araras1  Centro de Ciências Agrárias1 
关键词: competition;    degraded area;    phytotoxicity;    selectiveness;    herbicides;    tropical forest.;   
DOI  :  10.1590/S0100-83582011000100018
学科分类:农业科学(综合)
来源: Sociedade Brasileira da Ciencia das Plantas Daninhas (S B C P D) / Brazilian Society of Herb Science
PDF
【 摘 要 】

We aimed to evaluate the selectivity of the herbicides imazapyr, glyphosate, metribuzin, and sulfentrazone, when applied on four native species of semideciduous forests from southeastern Brazil: Acacia polyphylla and Enterolobium contortisiliquum (Fabaceae), and Ceiba speciosa and Luehea divaricata (Malvaceae). We did a randonmized design with four replicates per treatment: the application of imazapyr (125, 250, 500, 1000, 2000 and 3000 g ha-1), sulfentrazone (100, 200, 400, 800, 1400 and 2400 g ha-1), glyphosate (90, 180, 360, 720, 1440 and 2160 g ha-1), and metribuzin (360, 720, 1,920, 2880, 5760 and 8400 g ha-1), besides the control (without any herbicide). We evaluated phytotoxicity symptoms 30 days after application (DAA), and also dry biomass of leaves. Experimental plot comprised one seedling with 30 cm height. We concluded that glyphosate showed the lowest selectivity in relation to four tree species; therefore, we suggest that its application could be done through direct aplications. Behavior of four tree species varied in relation to selectivity of herbicides. For C. speciosa, imazapyr was the most selective herbicide, followed by sulfentrazone. Metribuzin was selective for A. polyphylla. In relation to E. contortisiliquum, metribuzin presented the lowest phytotoxicity, followed by sulfentrazone. For L. divaricata, only sulfentrazone showed selectiveness.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO201912010169600ZK.pdf 2084KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:10次 浏览次数:5次