期刊论文详细信息
Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia
Analysis of orthographic errors of children with cochlear implants
Goldfeld, Márcia1  Universidade Veiga de Almeida, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil1  Lemes, Juliana Prass1 
关键词: Cochlear implantation;    Language;    Handwriting;    Hearing loss;   
DOI  :  10.1590/S1516-80342008000300013
来源: Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia
PDF
【 摘 要 】

The aim the present collective case-study was to analyze the orthographic errors of elementary school children with cochlear implants. Four children who became deaf in the pre-lingual period were selected. All subjects started using hearing aids and began speech therapy before 18 months of age and had their cochlear implant surgery between 42 and 54 months. Using an orthographic observation script for dictations and compositions, the errors were classified, quantified, registered and then analyzed. The four categories with the highest incidence of orthographic errors were: voiced x unvoiced phonemes, multiple representations, omission of letters, and "others". All subjects had a much higher incidence of errors in activities involving dictation, in comparison to composition activities, suggesting that, in orthographic terms, dictation was more difficult than composition. The highest incidence of errors was related to acoustic and articulatory patterns, metalinguistic skills of phonological, lexical and morphosyntactic awareness, and other aspects linked to language and pronunciation. Among the reasons why the errors in dictation activities were higher is the fact that, during these activities, children tend to show lower ability of self-correction. Another important reason is related to the frequency effect and the restrict words repertoire due to the language delay. In general, this study identified approaches to help the speech-language therapist to better understand the written production of students with cochlear implants.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO201912010141838ZK.pdf 91KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:12次 浏览次数:28次