期刊论文详细信息
Public Health Nutrition
Procedures for screening out inaccurate reports of dietary energy intake
Cheryl L Hajduk1  Susan B Roberts1  Megan A Mccrory1 
关键词: Dietary methodology;    Energy intake;    Energy requirements;    Total energy expenditure;    Validity;    Obesity;   
DOI  :  10.1079/PHN2002387
学科分类:卫生学
来源: Cambridge University Press
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Objective:To review existing methods and illustrate the use of a new, simple method for identifying inaccurate reports of dietary energy intake (rEI).Design:Comparison of rEI with energy requirements estimated by using total energy expenditure predicted (pTEE) from age, weight, height and sex using a previously published equation. Propagation of error calculations was performed and cut-offs for excluding rEI at plus or minus two standard deviations (±2 SD) and ±1 SD for the agreement between rEI and pTEE were established.Setting:Dietary survey in a US national cohort: the Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals (CSFII), 1994–96.Subjects:Men and non-pregnant, non-lactating women aged 21–45 years in the CSFII who provided two multiple-pass 24-hour recalls, height and weight(n = 3755).Results:Average rEI was 77% of pTEE in men, and 64% of pTEE in women. Calculated cut-offs were rEI 160% of pTEE (±2 SD) and 130% of pTEE (±1 SD), respectively. Use of only the ±1 SD cut-offs, not the ±2 SD cut-offs, resulted in a relationship between rEI and body weight similar to what was expected (based on an independently calculated relationship between rEI and measured TEE). Exclusion of rEI outside either the ±2 SD (11% of subjects) or ±1 SD (57% of subjects) cut-offs did not affect mean reported macronutrient intakes, but did markedly affect relationships between dietary composition and body mass index.Conclusions:When examining relationships between diet and health, use of ±1 SD cut-offs may be preferable to ±2 SD cut-offs for excluding inaccurate dietary reports.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO201911300836724ZK.pdf 275KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:16次 浏览次数:36次