期刊论文详细信息
Ciência Rural
Anatomical and physiological characteristics of two argentine wheat cultivars
Jatimliansky, Raúl Jaime1  Sarli, Oliverio Guillermo1  Filgueira, Raúl Roberto1  Golik, Inés Silvina1 
[1] Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, Argentina
关键词: specific leaf area;    mesophyll area;    carbon dioxide exchange;    transpiration;    leaf anatomy;    conductance;   
DOI  :  10.1590/S0103-84782003000400008
学科分类:农业科学(综合)
来源: Universidade Federal de Santa Maria * Centro de Ciencias Rurais
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Two Argentine field grown wheat cultivars (Triticum aestivum L.), Buck Cencerro (BC) with traditional germoplasm, and Buck Pucará (BP) with Mexican germoplasm, have been investigated in order to compare anatomical and physiological characteristics of the flag leaf measured in heading (stage E59), anthesis (stage E69) and kernel water ripe (stage 71). In both cultivars, photosynthetic rate was not different for the same phenological stage, except for E71. Averages in stage E59 were higher than stages E69 and E71 for both cultivars (22.70, 18.40 and 10.40 µmol m-2 s-1 for BP and 23.82, 18.41 and 8.28 µmol m-2 s-1 for BC, respectively). Transpiration rates were higher in BP (5.0, 5.6 and 4.89 mmol m-2 s-1) than BC (3.3, 4.4 and 2.57 mmol m-2 s-1) for stages E59, E69 and E71, respectively. Consequently, instantaneous water use efficiencies were higher in BC than in BP. No difference between cultivars and phenological stages was observed in specific surface area (mesophyll area per unit mass) determined by physical adsorption of nitrogen at low temperature (78° K); the mean was 8.9 m2 g-1. It was similar as values found in previous works, in others T. aestivum L. and greater than the values found for Ligustrum lucidum Aiton, by the same technique. Differences could be attributed to the roughness of the cell wall and the dimensions of the cell itself. No positive correlation between specific surface and photosynthetic rate was observed neither for cultivars nor for phenological stages.

【 授权许可】

CC BY-NC   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO201911300189111ZK.pdf 197KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:5次 浏览次数:27次