期刊论文详细信息
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
COMPARING INNOVATIVE XR SYSTEMS IN CULTURAL HERITAGE. A CASE STUDY
Voinea, G.-D.^21  Carrozzino, M.^12 
[1] Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universitatea Transilvania din Brașov, 500036 Brașov, Romania^2;TeCIP, Scuola Superiore di Studi Universitari e di Perfezionamento Sant'Anna, 56127 Pisa, Italy^1
关键词: User Study;    Virtual Reality;    Augmented Reality;    Mixed Reality;    Education;    Interaction;    Manipulability;   
DOI  :  10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W11-373-2019
学科分类:地球科学(综合)
来源: Copernicus Publications
PDF
【 摘 要 】

The technological advances made in the recent years in the field of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) have led to a revolution in many adjacent areas. One of these is Cultural Heritage (CH), as the new array of XR technologies (a concept integrating Augmented, Mixed and Virtual Reality) is offering new interaction possibilities. The purpose of this paper is to compare several such technologies at application level, and to classify them based on common features such as Interaction, Manipulability, Ease of Use and others. The study presented in this paper was carried out during the H2020 project eHERITAGE (‘Expanding the Research and Innovation Capacity in Cultural Heritage Virtual Reality Applications’). The action had as output multiple XR systems/applications. We compare 4 of them: a smartphone-based AR application, a digital book with 3D elements deployed on a large touchscreen, a large holographic display and a bow simulator built using a VR headset and a mechatronic system. We evaluate these innovative systems in the context of the 2 educational events, when over 4000 participants interacted with our team. Results show that systems with greater interaction and immersion features were preferred over the others. Furthermore, Mixed Reality was preferred over Virtual and Augmented Reality.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO201911047507876ZK.pdf 973KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:73次 浏览次数:62次