¿La medicina científica y el programa Medicina Basada en Evidencia han fracasado?

Educacion Medica

Yahaira Becerra Becerra^3¹  Mariela Huerta Rosario^5²  Andrely Cristina Huerta Rosario^6³  Wilfor Aguirre Quispe^2⁴  Carlos Alva Díaz^1⁵  Jorge García Mostajo^4⁶ 

[1] Autor para correspondencia.^2;Hospital Guillermo Kaelin de la Fuente, Lima, Perú^4;Hospital Regional José Alfredo Mendoza Olavarria Jamo II-2, Tumbes, Perú^5;Instituto Nacional de Salud, Lima, Perú;Red de Eficacia Clínica y Sanitaria-REDECS, Lima, Perú^1;Servicio de Geriatría, Hospital Militar Geriátrico, Lima, Perú^3;Sociedad Científica de Estudiantes de Medicina Villarrealinos SOCEMVI, Lima, Perú^6

关键词: Evidence-based medicine;    Medical decisions;    Scientific medicine;    Positivist philosophical approach;   

DOI  :  10.1016/j.edumed.2017.04.003

学科分类：医学（综合）

来源: Fundacion Educacion Medica

【 摘 要 】

According to its critics and detractor, scientific medicine and the Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) program have failed. EBM is a program that seeks to respond to the need to systematise medical knowledge, improve the decision-making process in health and thus improve health systems. Despite its wide dissemination, it is not without criticism, from the questioning of its positivist philosophical approach, to its strictly biological and of effectiveness vision, and to the undeniable conflict of interests of biomedical research, which is mostly financed by the pharmaceutical industry. However, despite its limitations, there is still a long way to go, and its scope and benefits are already demonstrated in the current making of medical decisions.

【 授权许可】

CC BY