Environmental cycles regulate development time via circadian clock mediated gating of adult emergence

BMC Developmental Biology

Anjana James¹  Manishi Srivastava² 

[1] Behavioural Neurogenetics Laboratory, Neuroscience Unit, Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research, Bangalore, India;Chronobiology Laboratory, Evolutionary and Integrative Biology Unit (Formerly Evolutionary and Organismal Biology Unit), Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research, Bangalore, India

关键词: Pre-adult development;    Emergence;    Pupariation;    Circadian clocks;    Drosophila;    Period;    Adult emergence rhythm;    Pupation rhythm;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12861-018-0180-6

学科分类：生物科学（综合）

来源: BioMed Central

【 摘 要 】

Previous studies have implicated a role for circadian clocks in regulating pre-adult development of organisms. Among them two approaches are most notable: 1) use of insects whose clocks have different free-running periods and 2) imposition of artificial selection on either rate of development, timing of emergence or circadian period in laboratory populations. Using these two approaches, influence of clock on rate of development has been elucidated. However, the contribution of circadian clocks in determining time taken for pre-adult development has remained unclear. Here we present results of our studies aimed to understand this influence by examining populations of fruit flies carrying three different alleles of the period gene and hence having different free-running periods. We tried to achieve similarity of genetic background among the three strains while also ensuring that they harbored sufficient variation on loci other than period gene. We find that under constant conditions, flies with long period have slower development whereas in presence of light-dark cycles (LD) of various lengths, the speed of development for each genotype is influenced by whether their eclosion rhythms can entrain to them. Under LD 12:12 (T24), where all three strains entrain, they do not show any difference in time taken for emergence, whereas under LD 10:10 (T20) where long period flies do not entrain and LD 14:14 (T28) where short period flies do not entrain, they have slower and faster pre-adult development, respectively, compared to the controls. We also show that a prior stage in development namely pupation is not rhythmic though time taken for pupation is determined by both the environmental cycle and period allele. We discuss how in presence of daily time cues, interaction of the cyclic environmental factors with the clock determines the position and width of the gate available for a fly to emerge (duration of time within a cycle when adult emergence can occur) resulting in an altered developmental duration from that observed under constant conditions. We also discuss the relevance of genetic background influencing this regulation.

【 授权许可】

CC BY