Alternatives of surface treatments for adhesion of lithium disilicate ceramics

Revista Cubana de Estomatología

Cruz González, Alberto Carlos¹ 

[1] Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia

关键词: glass ceramics;    IPS e.max Press;    IPS e.max CAD;    hydrofluoric acid;    lithium-disilicate-glassceramic;    surface treatment;    silane;    universal adhesive.;   

DOI  :  

学科分类：基础医学

来源: SciELO

【 摘 要 】

Introduction:the clinical success of a restoration is strongly associated with the qualityand durability of the ceramic-cement resin interface. In order to obtain anadequate union between these materials of different nature surface treatmentsare used and achieve mechanical retention or chemical interaction.Objectives:to check if any method promotes a true chemical bond between lithium disilicateceramics and resin cement. As well as determineif there is any treatment thatreports bonding values comparable to hydrofluoric acid and silane (gold standard). Methods:a systematic literature review was developed based on the PRISMA strategy, wherethe databases were searched: Science Direct, Pubmed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, SpringerJournal, SciELO with MeSH and free terms from 2005 to November 2016 for articlesin English and Spanish on surface treatments for lithium disilicate.Results: from 58 publications selected a sample of 21 articles. Two articles reportedhigh risk of bias.Conclusions: hydrofluoric acid and silane continue to be the method with the highestand most reliable adhesion values in the literature. Universal adhesives arean alternative to promote chemical adhesion additional to the silane. Diamondburs, Nd: YAG and Er: YAG laser are not recommended as surface treatments.

【 授权许可】

CC BY-NC-SA