An Integrative Complexity Analysis of Religious and Irreligious Thinking

SAGE Open

Shannon C.Houck¹ 

关键词: integrative complexity;    religiosity;    atheism;    public perception;    stereotypes;   

DOI  :  10.1177/2158244018796302

学科分类：社会科学、人文和艺术（综合）

来源: Sage Journals

【 摘 要 】

Stereotypical views cast religious believers as closed-minded, unthinking individuals, and irreligious persons as comparatively more intellectual and complex. But are these perceptions accurate? To investigate, three studies assessed differences between religious and irreligious thinking on Integrative Complexity (IC). In Study 1, six atheist–Christian opponents were selected for IC. Findings revealed that Christians were significantly more complex than their atheist counterparts overall, but variability existed across comparisons. Study 2 examined persons writing about what matters most to them, finding that people more likely to generate religious language had significantly higher complexity. Study 3 evaluated a famous atheist-to-religious convert (C.S. Lewis) who wrote comparable materials during an irreligious and religious phase of his life. Results demonstrated that Lewis’ complexity was higher during his religious phase. Taken together, Studies 1 to 3 suggest that religious thinkers are sometimes more complex than nonreligious thinkers and vice versa—variability that sometimes goes unnoticed in public circles.

【 授权许可】

CC BY