期刊论文详细信息
Reviews in Urology
Histologic Changes in Prostate Cancer Detected Subsequent to the 2012 United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) Prostate Cancer Screening Recommendation
Kamlesh K. Yadav1  Carl A. Olsson2  Hugh J. Lavery3 
[1] Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY;Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Elmhurst, NY;Integrated Medical Professionals, PLLC, Melville, NY
关键词: Prostate cancer;    histopathology;    Prostate cancer screening;    Prostate cancer;    grade migration;   
DOI  :  10.3909/riu0815
学科分类:基础医学
来源: MedReviews, LLC
PDF
【 摘 要 】

We report changes in the histopathology of prostate cancer diagnosed in a large urology group practice after the final United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) Grade D recommendation against prostate-specific antigen screening. All prostate biopsies performed from 2011 through 2015 in a large urology group practice were retrospectively reviewed; 2012 was excluded as a transition year. The changes in biopsy data in years following the USPSTF decision (2013-2015) were then compared with baseline (2011). A total of 10,944 biopsies were evaluated during the study period. Positive biopsy rates rose from 39.1% at baseline to 45.2% in 2015 (P < 0.01) with a marked shift toward more aggressive cancer throughout the study period. The absolute number of patients presenting with Gleason Grade Group 4 or 5 increased from 155/year at baseline to 231, 297, and 285 in 2013, 2014, and 2015, respectively (P < 0.05), unrelated to age or racial changes over time. Black men represented 16% of the cohort. Since the USPSTF recommendation against prostate cancer screening, trends toward a substantial upward grade migration and increased volume of cancers were noted in a cohort of nearly 11,000 patients in a real-world clinical practice. Additionally, continuing reductions in cancer detection in the United States may exacerbate these trends.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO201910252630671ZK.pdf 712KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:6次 浏览次数:12次