Special Invited Paper: Continuities, Contradictions, and Critical Inquiry in Grounded Theory

International Journal of Qualitative Methods

KathyCharmaz¹ 

关键词: coding;    constructivist grounded theory;    epistemology;    methodological self-consciousness;    preconceptions;    reflexivity;   

DOI  :  10.1177/1609406917719350

学科分类：社会科学、人文和艺术（综合）

来源: Sage Journals

【 摘 要 】

What continuities and contradictions can qualitative researchers discern among versions of the grounded theory method? How do contradictions within the method affect research practice? How do new versions of grounded theory advance research practice and critical inquiry? To answer these questions, this keynote address begins with a brief overview of grounded theory for those who are unfamiliar with the method and subsequently discusses the continuities and contradictions between versions of the method. Constructivist grounded theory (CGT) uses the methodological strategies of the original version but builds on its pragmatist heritage, shifts its epistemological foundations, and resolves contradictions in earlier versions of the method. The result means placing grounded theory in the social constructionist tradition, viewing data as co-constructed with research participants, puncturing deeply held methodological preconceptions, and subsequently fostering a heightened methodological self-consciousness. The ...

【 授权许可】

CC BY-NC