期刊论文详细信息
Revista de microbiologia
Rhizobacterial characterization for quality control of eucalyptus biogrowth promoter products
Guimarães, Lúcio Mauro da Silva1  Zarpelon, Talyta Galafassi2  Alfenas-Zerbini, Poliane3 
[1] Bio Soja Indústrias Químicas e Biológicas, São Joaquim da Barra, Brazil;Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil;Fibria Centro de Tecnologia, Aracruz, Brazil
关键词: Formulation;    PGPR;    Eucalyptus;    Biological product.;   
DOI  :  10.1016/j.bjm.2016.07.013
学科分类:农业科学(综合)
来源: Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia / Brazilian Society for Microbiology
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria strains from special formulations have been used to optimize eucalyptus cutting production. To undertake quality control for the formulated products, the rhizobacterial strains should be characterized to assess their purity and authentication. In the present study, we characterized nine strains of rhizobacteria, including three Bacillus subtilis (S1, S2 and 3918), two Pseudomonas sp. (MF4 and FL2), P. putida (MF2), P. fulva (Ca), Frateuria aurantia (R1), and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (CIIb). The strains were differentiated by colony morphology after 24 h of incubation in three different solid state culture media (glucose-nutritive agar, 523 medium and yeast extract-mannitol agar), sensitivity to a panel of 28 antibiotics (expressed according to the formation of inhibition halos of bacterial growth in the presence of antibiotics), and PCR-RFLP profiles of the 16S rDNA gene produced using nine restriction enzymes. It was possible to differentiate all nine strains of rhizobacteria using their morphological characteristics and sensitivity to antibiotics. The molecular analysis allowed us to separate the strains CIIb, FL2 and R1 from the strains belonging to the genera Bacillus and Pseudomonas. By using these three methods concomitantly, we were able to determine strain purity and perform the authentication.

【 授权许可】

CC BY-NC   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO201910250362243ZK.pdf 1105KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:13次 浏览次数:12次