Are Risks from Medical Imaging Still too Small to be Observed or Nonexistent?

Dose-Response

  ¹ 

[1] Principal Health Physicist, M.H. Chew & Associates, Livermore, CA;

关键词: medical imaging;    linear no-threshold hypothesis;    radiation risk;    atomic bomb survivors;    computed tomography;   

DOI  :  10.2203/dose-response.14-030.Ulsh

来源: publisher

【 摘 要 】

Several radiation-related professional societies have concluded that carcinogenic risks associated with doses below 50–100 mSv are either too small to be detected, or are nonexistent. This is especially important in the context of doses from medical imaging. Radiation exposure to the public from medical imaging procedures is rising around the world, primarily due to increased utilization of computed tomography. Professional societies and advisory bodies consistently recommend against multiplying small doses by large populations to predict excess radiation-induced cancers, in large part because of the potential for sensational claims of health impacts which do not adequately take the associated uncertainties into account. Nonetheless, numerous articles have predicted thousands of future cancers as a result of CT scanning, and this has generated considerable concern among patients and parents. In addition, some authors claim that we now have direct epidemiological evidence of carcinogenic risks from medical imaging. This paper critically examines such claims, and concludes that the evidence cited does not provide direct evidence of low-dose carcinogenicity. These claims themselves have adverse public health impacts by frightening the public away from medically justified exams. It is time for the medical and scientific communities to be more assertive in responding to sensational claims of health risks.

【 授权许可】

Unknown