PERITO OU TESTEMUNHA: dilema entre a ampla defesa e a importação descontextualizada da testemunha técnica

UFSM Curso de Direito. Revista Eletronica

Rodrigo Grazinoli Garrido¹  Marco Antônio de Araujo Portes² 

[1] Jovem Cientista do Nosso Estado - FAPERJPerito Criminal - Diretor do IPPGF/PCERJProf. Adjunto - Coordenador do Mestrado em Direito - UCPProfessor Adjunto - FND/UFRJ;Mestrado em Direito pela Universidade Católica de Petrópolis

关键词: Juridical system;    Technical evidence;    Testimony;    Judicial activism;    Ciência Forense;    Perícia Oficial;    Civil Law;    Common Law;   

DOI  :  10.5902/1981369422405

学科分类：社会科学、人文和艺术（综合）

来源: Universidade Federal de Santa Maria * Departamento de Direito

【 摘 要 】

Despite the doctrine clearly differentiate the procedural figures of the expert and the witness, it has been reality in our courts to shall the specialist to act by testimony. It is created in our civil law the expert-witness, typical of the common law. The paper develops in an anthropological perspective, which seeks knowledge of the "other" to understand yourself. Thus, through indirect documentation methodology, it sought to define the criminal expert and the witness in our legal culture and in the American to recognize the origins of our “expert-witness”, its mode of action and possible procedural benefits, to justify

【 授权许可】

CC BY